So it’s no big surprise when Plaid Cymru, in a similar
blindspot moment, advises voters in England
(and Cornwall) to
vote Green. To their credit, the SNP and
Mebyon Kernow have not, as far as we know, told English voters what to do. We expect that regionalists living on the
Celtic fringe would want to support their respective nationalist parties. Even if they view separatism as a step too far,
for them, personally, the strength of nationalism in the polls adds momentum to
the debate on decentralisation generally.
Why then is the favour not returned? The nationalists could have said, vote for the
Greens or for the regionalists, both are causes we recognise as travelling the
same road as us. But no. If a choice has to be made then the
consistent one would have been to back the regionalist parties. There’s no conflict with the nationalist
cause in that case. Regionalists do not
put up candidates against the nationalist parties and never would have reason
to, because our territories do not overlap.
The Greens do it all the time. If
Plaid or the SNP fail to scrape through in some marginal seats it may well be
because of anti-nationalist Green candidates splitting the vote. If the Greens are all that’s deemed good
enough for the voters of England,
why are they not good enough for the voters of Scotland
and Wales?
When Nicola, Leanne and Natalie get together, does Natalie ever
ask why the Greens are being set up as an ersatz English nationalist
party? No doubt they’re all genuine in
their desire to work together but they do not do so as equals because the
Greens are every bit as much rivals as allies.
For all the talk of solidarity, electoral reality has to intervene, but
to what extent? And at what price in
integrity?
In Wales,
the Greens are notoriously anti-Welsh, with a classic ‘white settler’ mentality
towards the society they inhabit.
Coincidentally, they share some peripheral policies with Plaid. The core outlook that Plaid shares with
regionalist parties – a real commitment to decentralisation and the rebuilding
of identities shattered by centuries of micro-management from London – is not a coincidence but deep philosophical
common ground.
No-one in politics wants to be part of a coalition of
cripples if they can sprint for the finishing line under their own steam. The point is not that they should hold back
for others to catch up – that would be familiar Westminster
federalist thinking. It is that those
lower down the pecking order will
remember how they’re treated by those who today are – and we hope can continue
to be – a shining inspiration.
