Fortunately, the London
regime is known for looking ahead, anticipating such problems as arise from
climate change and planning new infrastructure to cope with them. It could have wasted tens of billions
building unnecessary new lines in the London
area, in response to the clamouring of bankers for shorter journey times to
their provincial fiefdoms. Instead it
had the foresight to listen to real experts and re-open the line from Exeter to Plymouth
via Okehampton and Tavistock – or any one of a number of alternatives – to provide a diversionary route. What could have been a disaster – Plymouth cut off from the
national rail network for up to six weeks – was thus carefully avoided.
In much the same way, the London
regime listened to those warning that Wessex cannot take more housing and
other development because its environment is at breaking point and can only get
worse. The regime responded by stopping
any more building, either on floodplains or on the higher ground from which
water runs off, and made it clear that the population of Wessex, far from
growing even further, needs to decline from its current, unsustainable level. Large-scale tree-planting was then
undertaken, to retain excess water and provide the raw material for future
renewable energy projects.
It would be nice to think that that’s what happened. A government at Westminster dependent for its survival on the
votes of Wessex Regionalist MPs would indeed have had to do all of the
above. As ever, it’s not the difference
you can see when we’re elected that counts but the difference you can see when
we aren’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment