So, what’s the Green Party for? Why does it pretend to be part of the
solution when it clearly has the same analysis of the problem as all the other
London-based parties? Namely that the
damage done by growth is to be cured by yet more growth. It has over recent years courted the
red-green vote, by playing up the red, but seemingly at the expense of the
green.
All parties are constantly challenged to say what they would
do to create more jobs. A really
courageous party would challenge the question.
We don’t need the maximum number of jobs. We need the optimum number of jobs for the
optimum size of population, given the sensible limits that define our region’s
place in a sustainable world. The UK has far, far
too many jobs for its size, many of them in the wrong places and many of them
financially profitable (for others) but socially useless and environmentally harmful. That’s one reason why it’s importing folk at
the rate of 250,000 a year net. It also
has a failed education and welfare system, because it has 2 million unemployed
who should be matched to the jobs available and trained to do them if they lack
the skills. Come on, this isn’t rocket
science, it’s the basic sustainability that corporate interests prevent us enjoying.
Growth isn’t necessary for economic reasons. It’s necessary only for fiscal reasons,
because without it the UK
cannot pay the interest on the imaginary debts it’s been fooled by bankers into
believing that it owes. The continued
refusal to confront this fact is what’s leading to planet-wide disaster as rising
debt outstrips the capacity of the real, resource-limited economy.
The future needs green politics. What it obviously doesn’t need is Green
politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment