Wednesday’s Western Daily Press
furnishes a classic example. Bristol East
MP Kerry McCarthy was reported as initiating a debate at Westminster on the protection of high-grade
farmland. She castigated the Government
for the way in which this key issue falls through the gap between two
departments, is not a priority for either, and yet is of vital importance to “food security, food sovereignty and the UK’s
declining self-sufficiency in food”.
She went on to say that in 2011 DEFRA reported a huge loss of the best
land to development over recent years, “although
we do not really know the extent, as such data are not collected
systematically”.
News this is not. We’ve been saying
it all for years. And years. And years. But it's an issue rarely on the political radar. When it does appear, it's often hiding behind more fashionable ideas like 'urban food growing', the subject of the debate in which Ms McCarthy spoke. Yes, allotments and gardens matter, but being hobby peasants won't keep us all fed: we need serious farming too. The fact that MPs are debating the protection of allotments but are continuing to sidestep the bigger picture is an indication of how little they understand or care what goes on outside the big cities.
Kerry McCarthy’s party is Labour.
Her party did not in government, and does not in opposition, have any
policy to curb population growth. It’s
even keener than the Conservatives – if that’s possible – to concrete over
southern England
in pursuit of astronomically high housing targets. If you want homes for ever more millions
Kerry, and you rightly won’t sacrifice our farmland to do it, please tell us, where
will you put them?
2 comments:
The allotments are not being ploughed up to build new homes on, though. They are being ploughed up for the controversial Metrobus scheme (a bus lane pretending to be a tram route), that also involves moving our city's war memorial, and which nobody in Bristol really wants, apart from our council.
I agree. What Kerry McCarthy is trying to defend is well worth defending. But while raising it as a constituency issue she also tried to raise the bigger picture. And that's where her party doesn't look so good.
Post a Comment